Since Sunshine Mary has been run off the internet -- at least for the moment -- Janet Bloomfield AKA Judgy Bitch is the clear runner up for the title of First Lady of the Manosphere. She is the MRA version of Ann Coulter: blonde, outrageous, racist, and as dumb as a box of rocks (but a whole lot louder). Here she is, in her position of Social Media Director (!) of AVfM's upcoming conference in Detroit, raising funds for the additional security she claims Doubletree Inn has demanded as a result of "feminist threats." The jury is still out as to whether the letter from Doubletree that she produces is genuine, but many are inclined to believe it is a fraud designed to extract more money from deluded MRM supporters to line the pockets of Paul Elam and his curious cabinet. I haven't seen any credible evidence of "death threats" although obviously if there were any I would want the authorities to investigate them seriously. Trust me, the last thing I want is for some MRA to enjoy martyrdom at the hands of a non-MRA.
But do "feminists" want to "silence" the MRM?
On one hand, I'll admit I DO silence Janet Bloomfield in the sense that after about fifteen seconds of her snarky, grating, affected delivery I have to turn the audio off. I can't watch Typhonblue for a different reason, one which I will not disclose for fear of being accused of being an "ableist" (sorry, I'm a very imperfect feminist). I don't want to silence the MRM. I want to criticize them, mock them, and expose them for the assholes and aberrations they generally are. And speaking strictly for myself, I welcome all the attention MRM is getting from the mainstream media. For over a year I've been running around like Chicken Little warning people about these loonies, but I'm afraid they thought I was just a bit demented myself for paying them any mind. The bigger the platform these people get, the better: the more their cracked ideology is exposed to the general public, the more quickly and decisively their "human rights movement" is revealed for what it is. It won't be radical feminists who bring down the MRM. Exposed to the strong sunlight of mainstream attention, they will melt down on their own.
Ann Coulter, watch out: there's a new anti-feminist female provocateur emerging, and she's just as blonde, skinny, and outrageously mean-spirited as you are! PLUS she's younger and -- dare I say it? -- even prettier. Yes, Mirror, mirror on the wall: it's JudgyBitch(catchy moniker!) AKA "Janet Bloomfield." She's a self-described stay at home mom, reported to be from Canada, with an undergraduate degree in film theory. She is affectionately referred to as "Drunky" on another anti-MRA blog because she is rumored to enjoy her booze. Allegedly. And God knows I'd be the last person in the world to condemn her for that! However, if alcohol is behind this brand of vitriol, she might want to reconsider blogging-while-drinking, cuz this lady is one mean drunk.
I will admit that one of my guiltiest pleasures is indulging my morbid fascination with really evil women. Male serial killers, architects of doom, and genocidal maniacs are a dime a dozen, but when a woman is truly horrible, she gets my attention. Hence my addiction to Deadly Women, or any stories about the likes of Myra Hindley, Elisabeth Bathory, and, most recently, Jodi Arias. Make of this predilection what you will -- I cannot defend it -- but clearly I'm not alone.
Of course, women don't have to be practicing Black Widows to fascinate me. They only have to think like sociopaths. I just spent an hour on one of Janet Bloomfield's blogs and I was impressed. There aren't many women out there with the balls to claim prepubescent girls "ask" to be molested in exchange for candy, cigarettes, or limo rides. In fact, Bloomfield has a lot to say about so-called rape and the women who invent it, but it boils down to her conviction that rape is a "fantasy" concocted by women too fat and unattractive to get real men to fuck them. Nice, huh?Bloomfield writes for A Voice For Men (presumably, in between mothering her three children, proudly crafting her husband sandwiches, and pouring herself just a little more chardonnay malbec).
To get the full flavor of Janet "JudgyBitch" Bloomfield, you have to watch her Youtube channel; every narcissist has one these days. The smug expression, the professionally cut and streaked blonde bob, the odd vocal affectations all scream a carefully crafted facade of upper middle class white privilege, and so enhance the appeal of her misogynistic rants immeasurably.
OK, it's easy for me to understand why someone can "judge" members of a perceived inferior class -- morally reprehensible, but it follows a kind of self-serving logic -- but to turn on one's own class is a very curious phenomenon to me. What does a woman gain by allying herself with her oppressor? Does she believe, on some level, that by disavowing her own vulnerability as a female (and the mother of females) and taking on the perpetrators' point of view, she wins special entitlements and protection? Is this some variation of Stockholm Syndrome? Armchair psychiatrists want to know!
And how does the adolescent daughter of such a woman react when the kids at school mention they watched hermomon the internet? How do the other mothers feel about JudgyBitch as a mother and potential role model for their own daughters?
Now I don't know if Janet Bloomfield is a pseudonym as she claims it is, but when a person posts videos on YouTube, doing everything she can to garner a sliver of attention from the boys, she is bound to be recognized by someone, sooner than later. And although she claims no fear of reprisals (from her husband's employer, from the college where maybe she will get a Ph.D. some day), I can predict with grim certainty that the wildly irresponsible claims and downright evil ideas she has posted about rape and pedophilia will not be easy to sweep away.
Oh, that's right: JudgyBitch doesn't give a shit what other people think of her (unless it's Paul Elam, perhaps).She's like the Courtney Love of the manosphere!Now where'd I put that corkscrew?