So over at A Voice For Men, Jack Barnes critiqued Matt Forney's latest and most desperate attempt to garner attention, an ode to spanking in order to control women. I will try to summarize it here as MRAs are notably long-winded, but the gist of it is that Forney is too EASY on women. By proposing that women's bad behavior must be controlled by men (by physical discipline), he is actually letting women off the hook. And I think Mr. Barnes has an important point.
Barnes starts by explaining that "strict gender roles, once necessary for human survival" restricted both men and women, but that it was modern women who "chose to case [these] aside... However, they have been reluctant to accept the responsibilities that come with being a fully realized and capable adult."
I myself have come across a few entitled princesses who thought that they should be able to enjoy both "equality" and the dubious benefits of "chivalry." Whether they are representative of most self-identified "feminists" I doubt.
I am a never-married woman nearly sixty who has been fully self-supporting since the age of twenty. I may have occasionally been "reluctant to accept the responsibilities," but I had little alternative. Although I often longed to be "equally yoked" to a caring spouse, the men who wanted to marry me were not capable or willing to pull their share of the freight. I put one boyfriend through college, another through truck-driving school, hoping they would prove to be the "responsible spouse" I longed for, but when, after considerable financial and emotional investment, neither came through, I had to cut them off and walk away, not because I didn't care about them, but because my resources were limited: it was literally a matter of survival. But maybe I've just been unusually unlucky or inept at husband-hunting? I don't shirk responsibility for my own poor choices here, just telling you very frankly what the reality of my life has been.
The fact is, at the time, I loved each of these men, and wanted nothing more than to contribute to their happiness and success. That they turned out to be poor investments of my money and energy does not change that reality. I take some comfort in knowing that in my long, checkered history of pair-bonding attempts, I have at least never left any man worse off for having known me. Yeah, I may be a "snowflake" but I don't think my experience makes me particularly "special."
"Despite what feminists would have you believe, men are, in fact, human
beings and deserve to be treated as such."
Mr. Barnes, you have a very warped perception of what a feminist is.
Mr. Barnes, I am a "feminist" who strongly supports, among other MRM causes, fathers' rights, and the protection of boys and incarcerated men from sexual assault or other forms of violence. I hate those commercials and sit-coms that portray men as bumbling idiots as much as you do. I rail against an economy and a military industrial complex that treats working-class males as cannon fodder. I have no beef with couples who choose to organize their personal lives according to "traditional" gender roles either. I do not believe in the inherent superiority of either gender.
Here's the deal with Men's Rights Activists like you, Mr. Barnes. You simply do not understand what (mainstream) "feminism" is. If you did, you would see that our goals are very much aligned. It's ridiculous for you to allow your "movement" to be infiltrated with misogynists. You complain that Matt Forney's ideas are immoral and loathsome, and I agree. What are you doing to disavow those same loathsome and immoral ideas from being broadcast by A Voice For Men?
"Women need to grow up. They are adults, which means they and they
alone are responsible for themselves."
I couldn't agree more.
"Forney’s belief that it is a man’s
responsibility to shape and mold an adult woman into behaving like an
adult is a burden that no man should have placed on him. It is a burden
that any intelligent man would swiftly reject along with the woman who
doesn’t know how to behave."
I absolutely agree.
"Let’s try the radical
notion that women are adults... Let’s expect women to
behave as adults, and when they don’t, we find another woman to spend
time with."
Yes, yes, let's!
So remind me... What is it, exactly, that we're fighting about?
Great post, Cinzia. Unfortunately, most so-called MRAs use the term "feminist" to mean someone who denies them sex as opposed to having any idea of what feminism means.
ReplyDeleteVery well said.
ReplyDeleteThe difference is Mr Barnes thinks women should behave responsibly, maturely and nobly, but he doesn't believe it's possible. While feminists think women in the main behave like already, and always have.
ReplyDeletecinzia please get a hold of me someway ... i need to speak to you about this artical
ReplyDeleteI think you are special, Cinzia. Self-sacrifice is rare, but a clear conscience is priceless. Certain types of empathetic and caring women need to be restrained from overgiving just as much as certain types of selfish and uncaring women need to learn to give. If one is going to err, better to have been too nice than not.
ReplyDelete